The turbulent life of Mr. Capital and fellow worker….story you must read.!.!.!

Once upon a time, life was quite

 more calm. The farmer worked the land, gave

 much to the Lord, but some of his own produce is his

 only the rest for life. Then it happened – big

 the change of expropriation in the sixteenth century and

 The farmer had no more land. Changed to comrade

 The worker was drawn into the struggle for satisfaction

 of their living needs, and stable property was

 converted into liquid wealth – capital. Instead

 in order to possess a stable world of permanent objects, they are

 people found themselves in an accelerated process of production and

 consumerism. Labor and natural resources have changed into

 “free-floating” factors of production ready

 for the capitalist market. With this redesign, however, they are

 century-old institutions also “liquefied”,

 which provided the Farmer with security and identity for a long time.

 Mr. Kapital and Comrade Delavec were not

 just best friends, but they still see each other a lot

 and socialize productively. They had worse and better

 days, ups and downs, but they depended on each other

 the other, one without the other did not exist. If

 Mr. Kapital wanted the job well done,

 had to control Comrade Delavec himself. So

 they stayed in the same cage willy-nilly and they were

 forced to negotiate despite frequent arguments,

 adapt and coordinate in creating tolerable

 the rules of socializing together.

 The period of “liquid modernity”, like today

 the period is called Zygmunt in the work of the same name

 Bauman, however, one partner was let out of the

 cages. Heavy modernity was the era of “mutual

 of engagement, fluid modernity is an epoch

 disengagement, elusiveness, easy escape

 and hopeless pursuits. In the ongoing modernity, those who rule

 which are the most elusive, which move freely

 and they never announce their movements,” he continues

 Bauman interpretation.

 The employment system we knew until

 now, based on high standardizations in all

 its dimensions: regarding the employment contract, place and

 working time. It goes without saying that work is also done

 performed in a certain place, at a certain time

 and in organizations or companies. Borders between

 work and non-work are clearly delineated, time and

 spatially defined and represent a border between

 unemployment and employment. Standardized

 the system of full employment is starting, as

 explains Ulrich Beck (Risk society: on the way

 to some other modern), slowly dismantle s

 flexibilization of its main dimensions: work

 law, place of work, working hours. Borders

 between work and non-work, they become blurred, spread flexible forms of “underemployment”.

 Technology has made it possible for Mr. Kapital

 can control and manage the Worker comrade

 Indirectly. Internal corporate links are at

 can be established electronically in most areas.

 Connection between work and production processes

 loosens up. Locally visible business forms,

 e.g. high-rise buildings and factory halls, the steps are invisible

 company organization. Work flexibility

 of time, transition from full-time to various

 and part-time jobs

 cannot be executed income fixed and

 neutral. By dividing working time, the goal of which

 is a generalization of underemployment, it goes hand in hand

 also redistribution of income, social security,

 career opportunities, positions in the company in the direction

 down, in the sense of a collective fall (average across

 professional, professional and hierarchical differentiations).

 The working time policy is in this sense, as

 Beck further thinks, also the politics of creation

 new social insecurities and inequalities. In that

 system, unemployment takes various forms

 underemployment practically integrated into the system

 recruitment, and it is replaced by generalization

 job insecurities, which are “aged” by the industrial

 he did not know the social system.

 Mr. Kapital thus threw off the annoying burden

 control and maintenance costs, he got rid of the excess

 the cover that tied him in direct contact

 with Comrade Delavec, who exploits him for his own

 self-reproduction and self-magnification. Theirs

 mutual dependence was unilaterally broken.

 Comrade Worker still depends on attendance

 of Mr. Kapital, while Mr. Kapital

 it can swim freely after various lures

 opportunities – and the partners with whom he will go down

 into them. Travels easily and quickly, with a portable

 computer in one hand and mobile phone in the other hand,

 which became the main source of uncertainty for everything else.

 Mr. Kapital does not insist on force. He prefers to fit in

 grid of possibilities as if he were paralyzed in a certain

 service. He has no problem destroying what he did, if that

 it takes a moment. He doesn’t care about his creations permanently

 binds, especially not emotionally. Almost nothing can

 stop in his parade.

 Even the institutions of the modern state are losing theirs

 they can no longer guarantee strength and comrade Worker

 security. “The modern state is wearing out,” he says Baumann. While all factors of political

 lives remain where they were, tied to their own

 positions, power flows far beyond theirs

 reach. “Our experience is similar to experience

 of passengers on a plane who discover high in the air that

 the pilot is not in the plane,” writes Zygmunt Bauman. Mr

 Capital became mobile, not tied to territory,

 which enables him to extort political agencies,

 bound to the territory. Every government must take note

 withdrew his threat to move elsewhere

 your investments. Mr. Kapital’s government cannot

 force him to stay, but he can entice him with creation

 the best possible conditions for free enterprise, which

 means that it has to adjust its political

 engaging in the rules of free enterprise.

 The government uses all the power at its disposal, yes

 deregulates, abolishes and repeals existing laws

 and regulations that hinder entrepreneurship. In practice this

 means low taxes, less or no rules, above all

 and a flexible labor market. There are no concrete examples

 need to look far. Slovenian Minister of Finance

 Andrej Bajuk otherwise defends the principle that work does not

 may be taxed more than capital and yet it is

 his government first gave tax relief to capital.

Leave a comment